The Gavel For 12/14/09: The Rummy One Is Protected Yet Again

Administrations of the future (and even this one if it happens) have every right now it seems to torture if protection for tortuous acts continue:

The Court’s denial of review of Rasul, et al., v. Myers, et al. (09-227) leaves intact a federal appeals court ruling that former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and ten military officers are legally immune to claims of torture and religious bias against inmates who were at Guantanamo but have since been released. The Obama Administration had urged the Court not to hear the case, saying that, whatever claims the four ex-detainees were now making, they had no legal basis for those challenges at the time they were at the U.S. military prison in Cuba — that is, between January 2002 and March 2004.

The D.C. Circuit Court had ruled in favor of immunity, and in doing so avoided a repeat of its earlier decision — vacated by the Supreme Court — that Guantanamo prisoners had no constitutional rights. The Justices had ordered reconsideration of that conclusion. Instead of ruling anew on the legal challenges, the Circuit Court opted for an immunity finding. The Supreme Court’s denial of review does not stand as a precedent on that point, or on the substance of the ex-prisoners’ challenges.

Gosh, I wish I could illegally be immune for a crime like Donald Rumsfield.

And I know I am joined by Ms. Wheeler in that sentiment:

But I guess Rummy and the others who facilitated torture like it that way.

Makes his Christmas in hidden seclusion all the more better!