One Of The Biggest War Leaks In US Military History
One of the biggest war leaks in the history of the United States military. Digest that massive statement :
With how they hate whistleblowers revealing information on how the government makes itself and our nation look bad, the Administration was obviously none too pleased about that .
National Security Advisor James Jones also made a point of emphasis, indicating that current days are much different than the plans of the past:
Regardless of this all, an important point is made here:
One of the biggest war leaks in US history.
We have our new lead story of the week folks.
A huge cache of secret US military files today provides a devastating portrait of the failing war in Afghanistan, revealing how coalition forces have killed hundreds of civilians in unreported incidents, Taliban attacks have soared and Nato commanders fear neighbouring Pakistan and Iran are fuelling the insurgency.
The disclosures come from more than 90,000 records of incidents and intelligence reports about the conflict obtained by the whistleblowers' website Wikileaks in one of the biggest leaks in US military history. The files, which were made available to the Guardian, the New York Times and the German weekly Der Spiegel, give a blow-by-blow account of the fighting over the last six years, which has so far cost the lives of more than 320 British and more than 1,000 US troops.
With how they hate whistleblowers revealing information on how the government makes itself and our nation look bad, the Administration was obviously none too pleased about that .
"The United States strongly condemns the disclosure of classified information by individuals and organizations which could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security. Wikileaks made no effort to contact us about these documents – the United States government learned from news organizations that these documents would be posted. These irresponsible leaks will not impact our ongoing commitment to deepen our partnerships with Afghanistan and Pakistan; to defeat our common enemies; and to support the aspirations of the Afghan and Pakistani people.
National Security Advisor James Jones also made a point of emphasis, indicating that current days are much different than the plans of the past:
The documents posted by Wikileaks reportedly cover a period of time from January 2004 to December 2009. On December 1, 2009, President Obama announced a new strategy with a substantial increase in resources for Afghanistan, and increased focus on al Qaeda and Taliban safe-havens in Pakistan, precisely because of the grave situation that had developed over several years. This shift in strategy addressed challenges in Afghanistan that were the subject of an exhaustive policy review last fall.
Regardless of this all, an important point is made here:
Rachel Reid, who investigates civilian casualty incidents in Afghanistan for Human Rights Watch, said: "These files bring to light what's been a consistent trend by US and NATO forces: the concealment of civilian casualties. Despite numerous tactical directives ordering transparent investigations when civilians are killed, there have been incidents I've investigated in recent months where this is still not happening. Accountability is not just something you do when you are caught. It should be part of the way US and NATO do business in Afghanistan every time they kill or harm civilians."It is not just the US looking a royal mess here, but all of NATO once again. And that is very important to indicate here.
One of the biggest war leaks in US history.
We have our new lead story of the week folks.
Comments